SON Home | UW Home | MyUW | UW Bothell | UW Tacoma | HealthLinks | Contact the School | Search SON | Internal


CMHC Home
Who We Are
Area Resources
Publications
Area Resources
 

Correctional Mental Health Collaboration

Current Projects

Understanding Supermaximum Confinement: Intensive Management Units in Washington State

The architectural, procedural, and surveillance features of Washington's intensive management units (IMUs) are designed to hold the most dangerous prisoners under conditions that minimize opportunities for assault or escape. The goal of our IMU studies is to better understand who is in IMUs, how their time in IMU relates to their histories and institutional practices, and the chances of successful transition to general population and the community. Ultimately this is part of a larger effort to improve community and prison safety by designing interventions for specific groups of inmates.
  • We have reviewed the electronic files of all inmates living in IMUs as of November, 1999 to provide a systematic profile of the IMU inmates and the diverse issues they pose. Results have been published ("Who lives in supermaximum custody," Federal Probation).
  • To provide more depth on clinical and policy issues, we have conducted interviews with 87 inmates and 38 staff at Washington's three principal IMUs, along with reviews of 122 medical charts.
  • We have conducted a participant-observation study of reform efforts at the largest of Washington's IMUs ("Challenging the Warehouse Mission," under review).
  • With the Department of Corrections and members of concerned outside groups, we are planning a conference, "Human Rights and Best Practices in Supermax Prisons: A Dialogue," to be held September 26-29th, 2001 in Seattle, Washington.

We have prepared three reports for the Department of Corrections. Journal articles include one publication, one under review, and one in preparation:

  • Who Lives in Supermaximum Custody? A Washington State Study, by D. Lovell, K. Cloyes, D. Allen, and L. Rhodes. Federal Probation, 2002, 64(2): 33-38.
  • Challenging the Warehouse Mission: A Case Study of Change in a Supermaximum Prison Unit, by. L. Rhodes, G. Jones, D. Lovell, and D. Allen, under review.
  • The Clinical Status of Supermaximum Inmates, by D. Lovell, K. Cloyes, D. Allen, and L. Rhodes, in preparation.

Evaluation of McNeil Island Correctional Center Mental Health Program: One of the Collaborations’ first projects was to help design and launch a medium-security psychiatric unit at MICC. The unit opened in 1994 and we have been evaluating its clinical programs since that time (for several years a multidisciplinary team also provided regular clinical consultations as well). The Collaboration has provided four annual project evaluations to the Department. Two articles have been published:

Mental Health Staffing Plan: We have worked closely with Department of Corrections officials and with the Mental Health Management Team (composed of the managers of mental health programs in the major institutions) to develop a mental health staffing plan. This plan is designed to serve the following objectives:

  • Fulfill the Department’s ethical and constitutional obligation to provide medically necessary treatment to inmates who are vulnerable due to serious mental illness;
  • Establish a mental health care system that is cost-effective, consistent across institutions, and readily understood by staff and administrators;
  • Provide treatment that will minimize institutional disruption while inmates with mental illness or behavioral disorders are in custody, and reduce risks to the community after their release.

To assist the Department in this effort, we obtained and analyzed mental health staffing plans from three comparison states that have made good-faith efforts to comply with court-monitored settlement decrees regarding mental health services. We also analyzed data from the Department’s survey of mental health staff effort, co-facilitated the Mental Health Management Team’s needs assessment, and prepared major portions of the report. Implementation of the plan will depend on legislative budget priorities, but it represents a major accomplishment of the Collaboration.

Legislative Initiatives. In recent years, key legislators in Washington have commissioned or backed legislation to improve the transition of mentally ill offenders from prison to the community. One of these, Senate Bill 5760 (1998), revised Washington’s sentencing system to authorize courts to order post-release mental health treatment for offenders whose criminal behavior is influenced by a mental illness, with the aim of facilitating collaboration between Department of Corrections and mental health staff while mentally ill offenders are supervised in the community. One of our team members wrote this bill and coordinated with legislators and other parties to secure its passage.

Other recent legislative initiatives have included Senate Bill 6002 (1968), which established a housing and service program in Seattle for 25 mentally ill offenders released from prison each year. These are people who might have been held in prison until their maximum release date because adequate services and housing were not available. Also, Senate Bill 5011 (1999), established an inter-agency task force to identify dangerous mentally ill offenders before their release from prison and establish treatment and community safety monitoring plans for them.

Community Transition Study. The Washington Institute for Mental Illness Research and Training, on the grounds of Western State Hospital in Steilacoom, Washington is a facility jointly operated by the Department of Social Health Services (DSHS), Mental Health Division, and the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washington. (The Eastern branch of the Institute, near Spokane, is academically affiliated with Washington State University.) Since 1998, the Institute has conducted a study of social service use and recidivism among mentally ill offenders released from Washington prisons in 1996 and 1997, with plans to continue the study into subsequent release cohorts. The study is principally funded by DSHS-Mental Health Division, and is being used to establish baseline rates of recidivism and service use for evaluation of Senate Bills 6002 and 5011. One of our members, David Lovell, is lead investigator in this project.

The Community Transition Study requires identifying all mentally ill offenders released from prison, collecting data from a variety of sources including the Department of Corrections, DSHS-Mental Health Division, other DSHS social service programs, National Crime Information Center, and juvenile, district, and superior court data from a database maintained by the Washington State Institute for Public Policy. There have been few studies of mentally ill offenders after release from prison; this study will have by far the largest number of subjects (337) and the most data to report. In addition, analysis of these data has provided estimates of risk factors for recidivism that compare favorably with risk assessment methods established in other recidivism studies.

 

 

 
Copyright © 2009 University of Washington
1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195