|
Evaluation Tools and Forms

The Parenting
Clinic conducts in-depth assessments on all parents and
children involved in its research projects. These assessments
consist of a combination of parent and teacher reports, home
and school observations and assessments of children's emotional,
social, and problem solving skills. To assist in these evaluation
activities, we have developed or revised a variety of tools
and forms. We have placed these measures on our website in
order to facilitate the research and clinical work of others.
You may go to the articles section of the web site to get
published summaries of the measures and to see what variables
were changed significantly by the programs delivered. Note
that some of the studies evaluate treatment versions of the
programs for children diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant
Disorder and others are for prevention interventions with
high risk and socio-economically disadvantaged populations.
We receive
many requests for help with these measures each week. We regret
that we do not have the funding or staff to respond individually
to each of these requests.
The following are some commonly asked questions to assist
you in using this site.
I
want to evaluate the parenting groups that I am running. What
measures should I use? Starred measures are recommended
as low cost evaluations for clinicians. Other measures are
more costly and primarily applicable to researchers.
NOTE: in the following recommendations the ECBI, CBCL,
SCBE, and TRF are published forms that are produced by other
investigators and must be ordered from their publishers.
To
evaluate the Parenting Program we suggest the following:
* Demographic Information and Family Background
* Parenting Practices Inventory (PPI)
* A parent report of child behavior: e.g., Eyberg Child Behavior
Checklist (ECBI) or Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
*A Teacher report of child behavior (e.g., Social Competence
and Behavior Evaluation (SCBE) or Achenbach Teacher Report
Form(TRF)
*Weekly session evaluations
*Parent Evaluation Satisfaction Form (post program)
To
evaluate the Child Dinosaur Program we suggest the following:
*A Teacher report of child behavior (e.g., Social Competence
and Behavior Evaluation (SCBE) or Achenbach Teacher Report
Form(TRF)
*Parent Evaluation Satisfaction Form (post program)
*Teacher Evaluation Satisfaction Form (post program)
To
evaluate the Teacher Program we suggest the following:
*Teacher Strategies Inventory
*Teacher Workshop Evaluations
*Teacher Evaluations Satisfaction Form (post program)
When
should I administer questionnaires in order to measure improvement?
We recommend having parents fill out pre-intervention questionnaires
immediately before starting the group, and then fill out post-intervention
questionnaires right after their last group session. For the
parent and teacher training you may do the pre-assessments
during your intake interview or during your first session.
At the last session you could repeat these assessments and
add the consumer satisfaction questionnaires. (This will likely
add an extra session to your total number of sessions).
How
do I know if parents have improved after the program?
In our research studies we measure improvement by looking
at how groups of intervention parents and children change
compared to a control group of parents and children. For clinical
purposes, one way to measure improvement is to see if parents
report lower levels of harsh parenting and higher levels of
positive parenting on the PPI from the pre to the post assessment.
Another way is to see if parents report that their children's
behavior has improved on the ECBI from pre to post. We have
recently added some rough cut-off guidelines for the PPI that
will assist you in determining whether parents' scores are
in a problematic range. Parents who score above the cut-offs
are probably at high-risk. If their scores drop below these
cut-offs, that means they are at lower-risk. The ECBI and
the CBCL have their own norms and can be used to determine
improvement in child behavior.
Were
these measures normed on large representative samples?
There are no norms for our measures (although our research
papers provide means and standard deviations for most scales
in our different samples). These measures were developed for
research purposes and, as such, are designed to look at whether
groups of participants change in meaningful ways across time.
Although we hope some day to use these measures in diagnostic
ways (e.g., to determine whether a particular participant
shows behavior in a clinical or normal range), at present
we do not have the data to support the use of most of these
scales in that way.
Will
these measures work for other samples? We have used these
measures with diverse samples of parents, teachers and children
between the ages of 3-8. We often conduct a new factor analysis
when we are analyzing data for a new population to assess
the fit of the measure to that population. In general, the
scales that we have created seem to be robust across samples
(with some minor changes). We encourage everyone who is using
these measures for research purposes to conduct their own
factor analyses on the measures to confirm the utility of
our scales in other samples.
Why
do I see multiple versions of the same scale listed on the
website with different scoring directions? These measures
have been revised multiple times over the years. We have included
both older and revised versions of our questionnaires on this
website because we receive requests about many different versions.
If you are reading about a measure in an article and the items
don't match up exactly with the website copies that probably
indicates that you are looking at a different version (not
all versions are on the website). In general, most scales
have stayed stable enough across the years to measure the
same construct even though scale names and some scale items
have changed.
What
version of a measure should I use? We recommend using
the most recent version whenever possible.
We hope
that this website is helpful to you. We are also sorry that
we do not have the staffing to answer all your questions individually.
Whenever we can, we update the site with new information that
we hope will be helpful!
Sincerely,
The University of Washington Parenting Clinic
Important
These tools
are password protected. To get a password, we ask that you
fill out a brief electronic form. This will provide us with
some information about who you are and how you will use these
tools. It also asks that you to agree to certain usage conditions.
To access this form, click
here.
Child
Assessments
- Wally
Social Skills and Problem Solving Game--The
Wally game assesses both the qualitative and quantitative
dimensions of a child's social problem solving. The game
uses a game-fantasy approach and 13 brightly colored pictures
of hypothetical problem situations related to object acquisition
and friendship skills.
Pictures used for Treatment
Studies and Prevention
Studies
Note: to insure the quality of the printed version
of Wally's test, the file sizes of the two documents are
large. Please be patient as they download.
Wally's Test for boys: PDF
Note: We only used the first 13 in the analysis.
Wally's Test for girls: PDF
Note: We only used the first 13 in the analysis.
Wally's Manual: PDF
Codes for Wally's Test (By Category): PDF
Codes for Wally's Test (Neg, Pos, Neither):
PDF
Wally's Coding Form: PDF
Problem Solving Codes (Numerically): PDF
Wally's
Categories (Prosocial, Agonistic): PDF
- Wally
Feelings Game--Children
are shown 8 colored pictures of problem situations and then
asked how they would feel if this happened to them and what
they would do or say to solve the problem.
Note: to insure the quality of the printed version
of the Wally Feelings game, the file sizes of the two documents
are large. Please be patient as they download.
Wally
Feeling Test for boys: PDF
Wally Feeling Test for girls: PDF
Classroom Observations
- Post
Observation Inventory--A post-observation inventory
that is completed by school observers to assess children's
behaviors such as fighting, refusing to accept authority,
harming others, breaking rules as well as prosocial behaviors
such as friendliness, staying on task, completing assignments
and cooperativeness. This inventory is completed after
each 30 minute observation of the target child.
PDF
- Independent
Observation of Children in Classroom-This
computer-based classroom observation coding system developed
by John Tapp and Joe Wehby at Vanderbilt University describes
children's behaviors in the classroom and on the playground.
It includes discrete events as well as duration events (e.g.,
percent of time disengaged from class activities.)
PDF
- Classroom
Atmosphere Measure--This 10-item questionnaire developed
by Fast Track (Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group)
is completed by school observers rating overall classroom
atmosphere. Measures include overall disruptive behavior
and student responsiveness to rules. This inventory
is completed after each 30 minute observation of the target
child.
PDF
- Teacher
Coder Impression Inventory (TCI)--This tool measures
the quality of teacher-child interactions in the classroom
and is completed after a 30 minute observation. We have
used it on teachers from Headstart through grade 3 in our
current study.
PDF
- Teacher
Coder Impression Inventory (TCI)-Summary scales, component
items and internal reliability
PDF
*Consumer
Satisfaction Forms
*Parents
- Basic
Parent Program Summary Scores
PDF
- Basic
Parent Questionnaire Evaluation Form for Incredible Years
Parent Group
(for use by group leaders) revised 6/15/06
PDF
- Parent
Evaluation of Basic+Advanced+School Program
PDF
- Parent
Evaluation of Classroom Dinosaur Program
PDF
- Parent
Evaluation of Clinic Dinosaur Program
PDF
- Parent
Evaluation of Parent Program, Year 1
PDF Scoring
Instructions PDF
- Parent
Evaluation of Parent Program, Year 2
PDF
Scoring Instructions PDF
- Parent
Program Weekly Evaluation Form
PDF
- 2005
Parent Evaluation of Treatment Program
PDF
*Teachers
- Teacher
Evaluation of Classroom Dinosaur Program
PDF
- Teacher
Classroom Management Satisfaction Questionnaire
PDF
- Teacher
Workshop Evaluation Form
PDF
*Leaders
- Parent
Program Leader Workshop Evaluation Form
PDF
- Parent
Program Evaluation/Attendance Form, Year 1
PDF
- Parent
Program Evaluation/Attendance Form, Year 2
PDF
- Parent
Program Evaluation/Attendance Form, ADHD grant
PDF
*Daily
Telephone Discipline Interview
- Parent Daily Report Checklist--This
checklist of 25 negative behaviors and 20 positive behaviors
is competed by parents. They target the negative behaviors
they would like to see less of and the positive behaviors
they would like to see more of.
PDF
- Coding
Examples for Daily Discipline Interview (DDI)--A list
of the negative and positive behaviors taken from interviews,
an explanation of the situation, how the parent handled
it and what was actually coded for each example.
PDF
- Coding
System for Daily Discipline Interview--This coding system
developed at The Parenting Clinic consists of 82 codes (defined)
for categorizing parent discipline responses. Examples include
hitting, yelling, grounding, teaching, and praising.
PDF
- Coding
Sheet for Daily Discipline Interview
PDF
- Daily
Discipline Interview Tally Sheet
PDF
- Daily
Discipline Interview
PDF
Fidelity
Checklists
Child
Program
- Incredible
Years Preschool Dina Program Lesson Units--includes
checklists for units one through seven.
PDF
- Incredible
Years Dina Program Lesson Units Year 1--includes
checklists for units one through seven. PDF
Teleform checklists for researchers: 1-2,
3,
4-5,
6-7
- Incredible
Years Dina Program Lesson Units Year 2--includes
checklists for units one through seven.
PDF
Teleform checklists for reseachers: 1-2,
3,
4-5,
6,
7
- Child
Group Leader Evaluations (Sessions, Attendance, etc.)
PDF
- Dinosaur
Small Group Treatment Process Fidelity Checklist
A checklist for evaluating the fidelity of dinosaur small
group treatment sessions
- Teacher
Child Group Process Checklist PDF--includes
checklist for evaluating dinosaur curriculum including large
group circle time skills, using videotapes to stimulate
role plays, small group practice activities and promotion
activities. These checklists can be used by teachers as
self-evaluation tools or by supervisors to give feedback
about curriculum delivery.
- Teacher
Child Group Process Rating Scale PDF--includes
same items in child checklist described above but rates
skills on a 7-point Likert scale. This measure is used by
researchers to evaluate quality and integrity of program
delivery.
Parent
Program
- Incredible
Years Basic Parenting Program Checklist--includes agendas
and checklists for sessions one through twelve, as well
as a toddler version of the basic program. PDF
Teleform checklists for Researchers: 1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12
- Incredible
Years Advance Parenting Program Checklist--includes
agendas and checklists for sessions one through eight. PDF
Teleform checklists for Researchers: 1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12
- Incredible
Years School Age Parenting Program Checklist--includes
agendas and checklists for sessions one through four.
PDF
- Peer
and Self-Evaluation Interpersonal Process Form PDF--includes
group process and interpersonal skills which are important
aspects of delivering this program to parents. This form
can be used for peer review and supervisors to give feedback
to group leaders.
- Parent
Group Leader Protocols and Checklists for Children (4 -
6 years) with ADHD
- Parent
Group Leader Collaborative Process Checklist PDF--includes
checklist for evaluating one 2-hour parent group session
including review of homework activities, use of videotape
vignettes to trigger discussions, effectiveness of role
plays, use of parents' principles and ways leaders handle
resistance. These checklists can be used by mentors and
trainers to give feedback after live review or videotape
review of sessions. These checklists are also helpful tools
for group leader self-evaluations and for determining readiness
for certification.
- Parent
Group Leader Rating Scale PDF--this
includes same items as in parent process checklist described
above but rates skills on a 7-point Likert scale. This measure
is used by researchers to evaluate the quality and integrity
of the program delivery.
NOTE:
Weekly parent evaluations and final evaluations are also
measures of quality of program delivery. (see consumer satisfaction
forms)
Followup
for Clinic Families
- One
and Two-Year Followup Questionnaire for Clinic Families
PDF
Group Leader Questionnaires
Child
Program
- Incredible
Years Child Training Teacher/Dinosaur Group Leader and Organization
Background Questionnaire. PDF
- Incredible
Years Group Leader Implementation and Evaluation of Classroom
Dinosaur Child Program. PDF
Parent
Program
- Incredible
Years Parent Group Leader and Agency Background Questionnaire.
PDF
- Incredible
Years Group Leader Implementation and Evaluation of Parent
Program. PDF
Home Observations
- FAQ's
- Coder Impressions Inventory--This
is completed following a half-hour observation of the parent-child
interaction in the home. It assesses parenting styles.
PDF
- Coder
Impressions Inventory Guidelines--Helpful
guidelines for completing the Inventory
PDF
- Coder Impressions Inventory
Summary Scales
PDF
2004 Article Summary Scales
2006: Items in Scales
and Internal Consistency for Scales Revised
- Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction
Coding System (136 pages)--This
coding manual provides complete definitions for assessing
parent and child interactions. It was revised by The Parenting
Clinic from a system originally developed by Dr. Sheila
Eyberg.
PDF
- Dyadic Parent-Child Interactive
Coding System--Summary
Scores & Internal Consistency
PDF
2006: Items in
Scales and Internal Consistency for Scales Revised
- Data Tally Sheet
PDF
- Home
Observation Procedures (16
pages) - This brief manual describes the rules and procedures
for home visits, the home observation measures and videotaping
parent-child play sessions.
PDF
INVOLVE Parent
& Teacher
The following two questionnaires evaluate the amount and quality
of parents' involvement with their children's education at
home and at school. They are completed by parents and teachers
separately.
*LIFT
Parenting Practices
- Parent Practices Interview
Form--This
questionnaire is adapted from the Oregon Social Learning
Center's Discipline Questionnaire and revised for young
children. It can be administered as an interview or used
as a self report questionnaire and is completed by the child's
primary caregiver.
PDF (old form)
PDF (new form)
- Parent
Practices Interview Form (Chinese version)
PDF
- Parent Practices Interview
Form (Spanish
version)
PDF
- Parent Practices Interview
Form (Portuguese
version)
PDF
and accompanying article PDF
- Parenting
Practices Interview Information--summary scales, internal
consistency scores and reference articles.
PDF old form
PDF new form
PDF
items used in 2004 article
2006: Items in
Scales and Internal Consistency for Scales Revised
PPI Cutoffs 2006
P-Comp
- Social Competence Scale
- Parent (P-COMP)--This
instrument, developed by the Conduct Problem Prevention
Research Group (Fast Track), consists of 12 items that assess
the child's positive social behaviors as perceived by the
parent, including frustration tolerance and communication
skills. A total social competence score is derived.
PDF
- Social
Competence Scale - Parent (P-COMP)--summary scales,
internal consistency scores and reference articles.
PDF
2006: Items
in Scales and Internal Consistency for Scales Revised
*Parent
Demographics
- Initial
Parent Interview
PDF
- Follow-up
Parent Interview
PDF
- Intake
Interview for Clinic Families
PDF
*Parent
Report of Behavior Problems
- The
Eyberg Child Behavior Checklist (ECBI) developed by S. Eyberg
is available by contacting the Customer Support Department
at Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. PAR's website
address is:
www.parinc.com or you
may contact them via e-mail at CustServ@parinc.com,
or via telephone at (800) 331-8378.
Parent
Report of Special Services
Peer
Interactions
- Dyadic
Peer Interaction coding system (Webster-Stratton, 1995),
a
derivative of the Dyadic Relationships Q-set developed by
Akerns (1988) and the PPS-I CARE (Webster-Stratton, Hollinsworth,
& Rogers, 1991) was developed to specifically evaluate
children's social skills and conflict management strategies.
The coding system resulted in 3 factors: Aggressive with
Peer (6 items), Inappropriate Play (8 items) and Positive
Communication (4 items).
PDF
Peer Problem-Solving
Interaction Communication-Affect Rating Coding System (PPS-I
CARE).
- The
PPS-I CARE coding system (Webster-Stratton, Hollinsworth,
& Rogers, 1991a), a derivative of Gottman's MACRO and
MICRO friendship observations measures, was developed to
specifically evaluate children's social skills and conflict
management strategies. Description
- PPS-I
CARE Coding
Manual
- PPS-I
CARE Coding Sheet
Problem-Solving-Interaction
Communication-Affect Rating-Engagement Coding System (PS-I
CARE).
- The
PS-I CARE coding system (Webster-Stratton, King, & Hollinsworth,
1991b), was developed to code marital conflict management
skills from videotapes of marital problem-solving discussions
in the clinic. Description
- PS-I
CARE Coding Manual
- PS-I
CARE Coding Sheet
Teacher Report
of Social Competence and Behavior
- Social
Competence and Behavior Evaluation (SCBE) - Preschool Edition
(LaFreniere, Dumas, Dubeau, & Capuano, 1992)
This
measure is an 80-item Likert rating scale developed to assess
patterns of social competence, emotional regulation and
expression, and adjustment difficulties in children from
preschool through age 8 years. It has been normed with Head
Start multi-ethnic children (LaFreniere & Dumas, 1995).
The questionnaire, completed by teachers, has four summary
scores (social competence, internalizing problems, externalizing
problems and general adaptation) balanced for positive (competence)
and negative (emotional or behavior problems) items, covering
an extensive array of behaviors commonly seen within a preschool
setting. The scale has good internal consistency, with Chronbach's
alpha coefficients ranging from .80 to.89. The externalizing
problems and social competence scores loaded onto the child
conduct problems at school construct. Chronbach's alpha
for the ethnic groups ranged from .86-.95. Please see
www.abnormalchild.com where the SCBE is featured on
Jean Dumas' website. He is currently McCourtney Professor
of Child Psychology at The Pennsylvania State University
(e-mail at jdumas@psu.edu).
Contact Western Psychological Services at wpspublish.com
for information on ordering the measure.
Teacher
Report of Special Services
*Teacher
Strategies Questionnaire
- Teacher Strategies Questionnaire--This
questionnaire asks teachers to rate the frequency with which
they use a number of teaching strategies and their ratings
of the usefulness of each strategy.
PDF
- Teacher
Strategies Information (1998)--
Summary scales and internal consistency scores.
- Teacher
Strategies Information (2005)
For information:
The Parenting Clinic
UW School of Nursing
(206) 543-6010
|